Neil DeGrasse Tyson Says No Animal Feels Pain During Sex, Forgets About Duck Penises

BY CLAIRE LANDSBAUM Pop culture writer.
Tweets @landsbaumshell

Neil DeGrasse Tyson, who himself is an expert at debunking flawed theories(sorry, B.o.B.), for once seems to have spoken too soon. Yesterday evening the renowned scientist and coital expert tweeted that if any two members of a species experienced pain during sex, that species probably died out.

Tyson immediately received angry replies from animal scientists pointing out that no, sex is not pleasurable for all animal species. Male cats, for example, have tiny spines on their penises, which is probably a little uncomfortable for the females. And then there are male ducks, which plant their sperm in female ducks by force. And male bedbugs, which literally pierce a female's abdomen to impregnate her, leaving an open wound.

So no, Neil, not all animal sex is pleasurable. Not even all human sex is pleasurable. Consider your tweet debunked.

Documentary: American Revolution - 1776

Documentary: American Revolution - 1776 by debunkerbuster

FINALLY! Scientific American Writer Exposes the Tribal Cultist Arrogance and Dogmatic Lunacy of Science 'Skeptics'

Today I'm tipping my hat to John Horgan, a blogger who writes for Scientific American, for his extraordinary article entitled Dear "Skeptics," Bash Homeopathy and Bigfoot Less, Mammograms and War More.

In his article, Horgan rightly points out that today's so-called "science skeptics" are little more than dogmatic tribal cultists (my words, not Horgan's) who celebrate "skeptical" thinking concerning their selected philosophical targets while vehemently denying anyone's right to question their own beliefs on things like breast cancer screening, vaccine safety, global warming and genetically engineered foods.

As Horgan eloquently explains in his piece, real skeptics are skeptical of everything, not just selected topics that are targeted by the madness of status quo science crowds (i.e. the "cult of scientism").
Real skepticism means questioning everything... especially the status quo

A real skeptic, in other words, would bring critical thinking to all of our science narratives and cultural beliefs, including those that cover the origin of the universe (cosmology), the origin of the human species, the nature of consciousness, the long history of indigenous botanical medicine, the cancer industry and mammography, homeopathy, antidepressant drugs, water filters, the existence of God and everything else imaginable. But far too many of today's infamous "skeptics" (such as Richard Dawkins) are really just cultists who labor under the false banner of "science." And they're offensive to real critical thinkers, it turns out.

"I don’t hang out with people who self-identify as capital-S Skeptics. Or Atheists. Or Rationalists," explains Horgan. "When people like this get together, they become tribal. They pat each other on the back and tell each other how smart they are compared to those outside the tribe. But belonging to a tribe often makes you dumber."

I've seen this myself, on both ends of the medicine spectrum. I've seen insanely stupid pharmacology experts swear that statin drugs are such miraculous chemicals that they should be dripped into the public water supply. But I've also seen "raw foodies" at festivals swearing that their "water vortexer machines" could levitate water in defiance of the laws of gravity.

In both cases, my critical thinking alarms go haywire, and I shake my head in disbelief that so many people are so gullible, regardless of their level of academic education or technical mastery of certain subjects. A highly trained doctor with an IQ of 200 can be just as functionally stupid as a high school dropout, I've observed. In fact, when it comes to medicine and health, many so-called "experts" are so ignorant of reality that they almost seem cognitively retarded.
http://www.naturalnews.com/054105_science_skeptics_Scientific_American_cult_of_scientism.html

Another layer to this cake is the strong likelihood that many of the leading 'Skeptics' are active (Government) disinformation propagandists, people like Michael Shermer, who ignore or obfuscate hard scientific evidence when it comes to high level corruption, such as with the September 11 attacks. Other issues related to science also come into play, such as hiding experimental evidence indicating the reality of ESP and the UFO phenomena.

I suspect that the leading proponents are recruited because they have corrupt, or intelligence-linked, backgrounds.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 26th, 2016.]

GMOs Are Totally Safe

Click His Big Head to Make it Even Bigger

GMO SCIENCE – STUDIES & RESEARCH  

This compilation is a sample of the scientific references including over 2000 studies, surveys, and analyses that suggest various adverse impacts and potential adverse impacts of genetically engineered (GE/GMO) crops, foods and related pesticides. This list contains references regarding health impacts, environmental impacts, including impact of non-target organisms (NTOs), resistance of target organisms, pesticide drift, genetic contamination, horizontal gene transfer, unintended effects, as well as references regarding yields, social impact, ethics, economics and regulations. In most cases, links are provided to the abstracts for the references or links to sites where the study can be purchased.

LANDMARK TEST LINKS TOXIC INSECTICIDE DUST TO BEE HIVE DAMAGE

Monsanto Weed Killer Found in German Beer

36 DIFFERENT PESTICIDES FOUND IN HAWAIIAN CHILD’S HAIR SAMPLE - Her family lives near GMO crop testing site.

GMOs encourage weight gain and obesity, researchers discover

Unbelievably bad science in the movie Seeds of Death?

Why Buy Healthy, Non-GMO Pet Food?

Care2.com GMO Petitions

Neil deGrasse Tyson is ruining ‘Star Wars' for everyone

StarWarsParodyHub.BlogSpot.com